Initializing a Java object in a separate method: why this won't workjava
As Armen mentioned, what you want to do is not possible this way. Why not use a factory method?
Here's a thing that I can't tell I'm surprised it won't work, but anyway it's interesting for me to find the explanation of this case. Imagine we have an object:
SomeClass someClass = null;
And a method that will take this object as a parameter to initialize it:
public void initialize(SomeClass someClass) {
someClass = new SomeClass();
}
And then when we call:
initialize(someClass);
System.out.println("" + someClass);
It will print:
null
Thanks for your answers!
Is Java “pass-by-reference” or “pass-by-value”?
Java is always pass-by-value. Unfortunately, they decided to call the location of an object a "reference". When we pass the value of an object, we are passing the reference to it. This is confusing to beginners.
It goes like this:
public static void main( String[] args ) {
Dog aDog = new Dog("Max");
// we pass the object to foo
foo(aDog);
// aDog variable is still pointing to the "Max" dog when foo(...) returns
aDog.getName().equals("Max"); // true, java passes by value
aDog.getName().equals("Fifi"); // false
}
public static void foo(Dog d) {
d.getName().equals("Max"); // true
// change d inside of foo() to point to a new Dog instance "Fifi"
d = new Dog("Fifi");
d.getName().equals("Fifi"); // true
}
In this example aDog.getName()
will still return "Max"
. The value aDog
within main
is not changed in the function foo
with the Dog
"Fifi"
as the object reference is passed by value. If it were passed by reference, then the aDog.getName()
in main
would return "Fifi"
after the call to foo
.
Likewise:
public static void main( String[] args ) {
Dog aDog = new Dog("Max");
foo(aDog);
// when foo(...) returns, the name of the dog has been changed to "Fifi"
aDog.getName().equals("Fifi"); // true
}
public static void foo(Dog d) {
d.getName().equals("Max"); // true
// this changes the name of d to be "Fifi"
d.setName("Fifi");
}
In the above example, FiFi
is the dog's name after call to foo(aDog)
because the object's name was set inside of foo(...)
. Any operations that foo
performs on d
are such that, for all practical purposes, they are performed on aDog
itself (except when d
is changed to point to a different Dog
instance like d = new Dog("Boxer")
).
Java always passes arguments by value NOT by reference.
Let me explain this through an example:
public class Main{
public static void main(String[] args){
Foo f = new Foo("f");
changeReference(f); // It won't change the reference!
modifyReference(f); // It will modify the object that the reference variable "f" refers to!
}
public static void changeReference(Foo a){
Foo b = new Foo("b");
a = b;
}
public static void modifyReference(Foo c){
c.setAttribute("c");
}
}
I will explain this in steps:
Declaring a reference named
f
of typeFoo
and assign it to a new object of typeFoo
with an attribute"f"
.Foo f = new Foo("f");
From the method side, a reference of type
Foo
with a namea
is declared and it's initially assigned tonull
.public static void changeReference(Foo a)
As you call the method
changeReference
, the referencea
will be assigned to the object which is passed as an argument.changeReference(f);
Declaring a reference named
b
of typeFoo
and assign it to a new object of typeFoo
with an attribute"b"
.Foo b = new Foo("b");
a = b
is re-assigning the referencea
NOTf
to the object whose its attribute is"b"
.As you call
modifyReference(Foo c)
method, a referencec
is created and assigned to the object with attribute"f"
.c.setAttribute("c");
will change the attribute of the object that referencec
points to it, and it's same object that referencef
points to it.
I hope you understand now how passing objects as arguments works in Java :)
Can I pass parameters by reference in Java?
No.
Why ? Java has only one mode of passing arguments to methods: by value.
Note:
For primitives this is easy to understand: you get a copy of the value.
For all other you get a copy of the reference and this is called also passing by value.
It is all in this picture: