c++ upcast - Downcasting shared_ptr<Base>to shared_ptr<Derived>?



static_pointer_cast dynamic_pointer_cast (4)

If somebody gets here with boost::shared_ptr...

This is how you can downcast to the derived Boost shared_ptr. Assuming Derived inherits from Base.

boost::shared_ptr<Base> bS;
bS.reset(new Derived());

boost::shared_ptr<Derived> dS = boost::dynamic_pointer_cast<Derived,Base>(bS);
std::cout << "DerivedSPtr  is: " << std::boolalpha << (dS.get() != 0) << std::endl;

Make sure 'Base' class/struct has at least one virtual function. A virtual destructor also works.

Update: the shared_ptr in this example is like the one in Boost, but it doesn't support shared_polymorphic_downcast (or dynamic_pointer_cast or static_pointer_cast for that matter)!

I'm trying to initialize a shared pointer to a derived class without losing the reference count:

struct Base { };
struct Derived : public Base { };
shared_ptr<Base> base(new Base());
shared_ptr<Derived> derived;

// error: invalid conversion from 'Base* const' to 'Derived*'
derived = base;  

So far, so good. I didn't expect C++ to implicitly convert Base* to Derived*. However, I do want the functionality expressed by the code (that is, maintaining the reference count while downcasting the base pointer). My first thought was to provide a cast operator in Base so that an implicit conversion to Derived could take place (for pedants: I would check that the down cast is valid, don't worry):

struct Base {
  operator Derived* ();
}
// ...
Base::operator Derived* () {
  return down_cast<Derived*>(this);
}

Well, it didn't help. It seems the compiler completely ignored my typecast operator. Any ideas how I could make the shared_ptr assignment work? For extra points: what kind of type Base* const is? const Base* I understand, but Base* const? What does const refer to in this case?


You can use dynamic_pointer_cast. It is supported by std::shared_ptr.

std::shared_ptr<Base> base (new Derived());
std::shared_ptr<Derived> derived =
               std::dynamic_pointer_cast<Derived> (base);

Also, I don't recommend using cast operator in the base class. Implicit casting like this may become the source of bugs and errors.

-Update: If the type is not polymorphic, std::static_pointer_cast may be used.


I assume you're using boost::shared_ptr... I think you want dynamic_pointer_cast or shared_polymorphic_downcast.

These require polymorphic types, however.

what kind of type Base* const is? const Base* I understand, but Base* const? What does const refer to in this case?

  • const Base * is a mutable pointer to a constant Base.
  • Base const * is a mutable pointer to a constant Base.
  • Base * const is a constant pointer to a mutable Base.
  • Base const * const is a constant pointer to a constant Base.

Here's a minimal example:

struct Base { virtual ~Base() { } };   // dynamic casts require polymorphic types
struct Derived : public Base { };

boost::shared_ptr<Base> base(new Base());
boost::shared_ptr<Derived> derived;
derived = boost::static_pointer_cast<Derived>(base);
derived = boost::dynamic_pointer_cast<Derived>(base);
derived = boost::shared_polymorphic_downcast<Derived>(base);

I'm not sure if it was intentional that your example creates an instance of the base type and casts it, but it serves to illustrate the difference nicely.

The static_pointer_cast will "just do it". This will result in undefined behavior (a Derived* pointing at memory allocated for and initialized by Base) and will likely cause a crash, or worse. The reference count on base will be incremented.

The dynamic_pointer_cast will result in a null pointer. The reference count on base will be unchanged.

The shared_polymorphic_downcast will have the same result as a static cast, but will trigger an assertion, rather seeming to succeed and leading to undefined behavior. The reference count on base will be incremented.

See (dead link):

Sometimes it is a little hard to decide whether to use static_cast or dynamic_cast, and you wish you could have a little bit of both worlds. It is well known that dynamic_cast has a runtime overhead, but it is safer, whereas static_cast has no overhead at all, but it may fail silently. How nice it would be if you could use shared_dynamic_cast in debug builds, and shared_static_cast in release builds. Well, such a thing is already available and is called shared_polymorphic_downcast.


Instead of using "-lcurl" use "-l:libcurl.so.3" And ofcourse also use "-L _installed_path_"





c++ gcc boost